2022 · Industrial and energy operators · Process and architecture ownership

Process architecture for operational workflows

Business process modelling against BPMN 2.0 and APQC, applied where operational workflows have to reconcile with the money they generate.

Modelled against recognised standards, not local convention
Workflows that reconcile with their financial record

The situation

Operational workflows had grown by accretion. Each step made sense to the person performing it, and nobody held a description of the whole path, which made both automation and audit impossible to scope.

The constraint

Process work invites invention, and an in-house notation that only its author understands is worth very little two years later. Modelling had to sit on standards a third party could read, because the point of the exercise was to survive a change of personnel.

What I decided

I modelled against BPMN 2.0 and the APQC framework rather than inventing a local notation, and I traced each operational step through to its financial consequence. A workflow that cannot be reconciled against what it bills or settles is not finished, however tidy the diagram looks.

What shipped

End-to-end process models and a restructured set of workflows, expressed in standard notation with the decision points and handoffs made explicit.

What it produced

Workflows that could be automated or audited without being reverse-engineered first, and measurable gains in throughput where the bottleneck turned out to be a handoff rather than a task.